Discussions of color often inspire soaring flights of fancy and philosophy, of broad connections and grand visions. And why not? Without the ability to perceive color, the world would be a dark, dank, dismal and dangerous place. With it, our existence is richer, more beautiful and more comprehensible. Still, as an inveterate philistine — not so much a native of ancient Philistia as someone lacking in cultural or aesthetic refinement — I feel compelled to make explicit that which is implicit in the forecasting exercise: Color Sells. In preparing this month’s special Color Forecast report, I was especially drawn to a story about the introduction in Japan of Pantone-colored mobile phones. The manufacturer, SoftBank, is betting that the color choices will differentiate its product from the many other perfectly functional phones available in the insanely crowded telecommunications marketplace. The product line was introduced on the fashion-forward runways of Tokyo with models dressed in color-coordinated outfits, and supported with matching print, packaging and posters. Early reports suggest tremendous success, and while the idea is not exactly novel, this execution is likely to spur the further integration of color into a range of technology products that are otherwise numbingly interchangeable. Why? Because color sells.
Keep SwingingIn the March 2007 magazine, we published a letter from Michael Stanard who argued that graphic designers, often liberal, sensitive and well meaning, overestimate their ability to effect social change. “As graphic designers,” he wrote, “we have no meaningful societal influence, because we don’t control the content of our work.” Needless to say this has touched off a lively debate, typified by an interesting response from Bob Rankin of Rankin Design, Bellevue WA, who writes, in part:
“It's a good thing to express frustration — that’s the first step to finding a solution. Our society was founded on debate, it makes some of us think. GDUSA often has thought provoking ideas. From my 35 years of experience, I am sympathetic. I worked for a couple of years in a design group at a large airplane manufacturing company. The joke was, "Who will care about the particular design/advertising project I'm working on 50 years from now?" They were right, most often no one will care or even remember, not even the printer. Design is what it is, a plan, a plan that effects branding, marketing, the bottomline and is affected by the same. Sure, sometimes what graphic designers do is banal and simply lubricates the wheels of commerce. But take an object such as the Apple iPod. This was a timely product design (I sold my stock too soon) and the graphic design that expressed the product was on target. The product/brand/design have combined to have a profound effect on society. Why are some designers considered important, like Herb Lubalin or Paul Rand? Their design had an impact, it affected our society, the way we perceive things, and more importantly developed and introduced new expectations for our culture. There many examples where graphic design has help define and explain (brand) our culture. The microcosm — designing a direct mail program — might not seem significant. The macrocosm — helping to introduce a new drug or zero emission auto — could have a global social impact. In terms of making an impact on society,
it’s like baseball, the designer gets called from the bench, some of us don’t get to bat in the regular line up. A designer has the opportunity to hit a home run, every time, or maybe just a hit — I’ve been walked before — we work hard for every trip up to the plate. Sometimes we can make a difference, sometimes not. But we stay in the game and keep swinging ... we love the game.
ContextPositive reaction to the April 2007 LogoLounge trends piece continues to flow. My own favorite observation by Bill Gardner, lord of the logo, is that “whether we are noting social, conceptual or aesthetic trends, remember that none of them exist in a vacuum or a single moment in time. They are the results of many trends before them and are developing taproots as we speak.” If you haven’t read the article — how logo development can be shaped by science, economics, technology, politics and pop culture — I urge you to do so. Visit gdusa.com and click on Current Issue or Past Issues, depending on when you are reading this.